Key Takeaways
- Our pet preferences and relationships can give us insight into who we are, how we operate, and how we interact with the world.
- While dog lovers might see themselves as energetic, outgoing, and always up for an adventure, cat people embrace their introspective, witty, and sometimes enigmatic nature.
- Though it’s not an exact or hard science, research can go beyond cultural stereotypes and provide a glimmer of our personalities.
Are you a devoted dog person, always ready for a tail-wagging adventure or a gleeful greeting? Or do you consider yourself more of a cat person, perfectly at ease with your independent, slightly mysterious roommate who has a weird habit of testing gravity? We know it’s cliché, but pet preferences run deep. So deep, in fact, that they might reveal more about our personalities than we realize.
“Research suggests that our choice between cats and dogs can be influenced by a mix of psychological, social, and cultural factors, shaping our personality traits and social behaviors,” says Patricia Dixon, PsyD, a licensed clinical psychologist and author in Tampa Bay, Florida.
What Our Pet Preferences Might Say About Our Attachment Style
Our emotional connections with different types of pets can potentially give us some insights into our attachment style (a pattern of behavior in relationships).
“Dog lovers [may] enjoy close and reciprocal relationships with dogs as they resemble secure, dependent bonds that provide emotional comfort, stability, and security,” says Michael Kane, PsyD, a psychiatrist based in Indiana.
“Cat enthusiasts, on the other hand, [may] appreciate the less demanding and more autonomous companionship offered by cats. Feline indulgers enjoy the companionship of cats as they prefer connections that are meaningful but not as demanding.”
Our Desire for Structure or Spontaneity
How we move about the world might also be related to our pet preferences. For example, dog owners often thrive in environments with routine and structure. Regular walks, feeding schedules, and training sessions naturally encourage a more organized lifestyle. Studies have even found that dog owners often score higher in conscientiousness, a trait associated with self-discipline, organization, and a preference for planned behavior.
In contrast, cat owners may be more adaptable and comfortable with a looser, go-with-the-flow approach, as felines tend to be more independent and require less regimented care. This could reflect a person’s comfort level with spontaneity, flexibility, and self-guided motivation in their daily life.
It Might Suggest Whether We’re Introverted or Extroverted
Our pet preferences may also come in handy when analyzing whether we’re extroverted or introverted, Dr. Kane says. Think of it as the difference between a vibrant group hike and a cozy night in with a good book, adds Dr. Dixon. Both are wonderful in their own right—just different.
“Studies show that those who call themselves ‘dog people‘ tend to have higher scores on extroversion, which means they are more sociable, in addition to agreeableness and conscientiousness, which describes a cooperative and responsible personality,” says Dr. Kane. “Meanwhile, ‘cat people’ have shown to be more open to experience and scored higher on introversion, which suggests that they appreciate more solitude and less social interaction.”
The Differences Between Cat People and Dog People
We outlined some of the biggest differences between cat vs. dog people above, but let’s go ahead and dive a little bit deeper into each of these “types” of people.
Characteristics of Cat People
- Imaginative
- Introverted
- Curious
- Drawn to creative or intellectual pursuits
- Spontaneous and flexible
- Self-reflective
- Reserved
- Values autonomy
- Slow, deep bonds
- Social when it suits them
- Independent thinkers
- Emotionally intuitive
In a nutshell, cat people are often considered imaginative, inquisitive, and self-reflective. They also tend to be more reserved and appreciate solitude and silence. “Whilst many people appreciate loving relationships, the bond that cat people value usually grows over time, in the same manner that cats form relationships with humans,” Dr. Kane adds.
Dr. Dixon adds that, psychologically speaking, a cat person might also strongly value independence and autonomy. “They thrive in their own space but can be social when it suits them—like an introvert who shines at a party, as long as it’s on their own terms,” she says.
Characteristics of a Dog Person
- Energetic
- Extroverted
- Socially inclined
- Loves to feel needed
- Prefers structure and routine
- Active lifestyle
- Outgoing and approachable
- Thrives in group settings
- Enjoys teamwork and collaboration
- Loyal and dependable
- Seeks external validation and affirmation
- Warm and emotionally expressive
The average dog person is perceived to be much more extroverted, energetic, and socially inclined than the average cat lover. “They’re typically someone who thrives on social connection and the joy of being needed,” Dr. Dixon says. “They love the feeling of being part of a pack, both with their furry friend and the people around them.”
Their pets reinforce this dynamic, encouraging a bounty of social interactions and an active lifestyle. Additionally, dog owners may love the reliability of a good routine and external motivation, such as structured schedules, planned social outings, and even career choices that lend to teamwork.
Regardless of where you fall on the spectrum—and maybe it’s even somewhere in between—one thing is certain: both pets provide deeply meaningful companionship.
Verywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss. Basic Books.
Dog people vs. Cat people | siowfa15: Science in our world: Certainty and controversy. (n.d.).
Gosling, S. D., Sandy, C. J., & Potter, J. (2010). Personalities of self-identified “dog people” and “cat people.” Anthrozoös, 23(3), 213–222. doi:10.2752/175303710X12750451258850
Thanks for your feedback!
What is your feedback?
Helpful
Report an Error
Other
