Key Takeaways
- The Bronfenbrenner ecological model explains how aspects of environment and society shape human development.
- The model focuses on the constant, dynamic interaction between individuals and the systems in which they live and interact.
- Understanding these connections allows parents, teachers, and policymakers to support healthy development better.
The Bronfenbrenner ecological model explains how human development is influenced by the multiple environments we live in. It shows how individuals interact with different levels of influence, which include family, peers, schools, communities, and culture. The model emphasizes how dynamic development is and how social and environmental factors shape it.
d3sign/Moment/Getty images
The 5 Systems in the Bronfenbrenner Ecological Model
Bronfenbrenner’s theory is organized into a series of five nested systems or levels. The five main elements of Bronfenbrenner’s theory are the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem.
You can visualize the framework by imagining the individual at the center of a circle, surrounded by five concentric rings starting with the first circle (the microsystem) and expanding outward to the outermost circle (the chronosystem).
1. Microsystem
The microsystem is the innermost level, composed of an individual’s immediate environment. Examples include the people the person interacts with daily, including their family members, friends, classmates, teachers, and others.
The microsystem has the most direct, immediate impact on the individual.
The relationships and interactions within the microsystem are also bidirectional; people are influenced by their close contacts, but they also affect the people and environments around them. Because of these relationships’ close, direct nature, they have a powerful effect on shaping an individual’s development and behavior.
Personal characteristics, including mental abilities, physical attributes, temperament, and personality, also impact a person’s development.
A proposed update to Bronfenbrenner’s theory suggests two types of microsystems: physical and virtual. Given the importance of digital influences on young people today, it is essential to recognize how virtual environments may influence child development.
2. The Mesosystem
The mesosystem is the next level of the model, comprised of all the relationships and interactions between the microsystems. Examples of mesosystems in a child’s life include the interactions between their family and school or between their friends and family.
Like the microsystem, the mesosystem has a direct effect on the individual.
The different microsystems are connected at this level. This means that changes in one microsystem can then impact other microsystems.
In other words, how these elements interact can influence how a child develops. For example, a child’s family and school interaction can impact learning and academic performance.
3. The Exosystem
The exosystem refers to environments in which the individual is not an active participant but still impacts development. This level encompasses the social context in which a person lives and other aspects of the environment, including:
- Government policies
- Social services
- Community resources
- Mass media
The individual does not have direct contact with these influences, but they still shape how a child develops.
For example, government policies and community resources impact a child’s access to healthcare, quality child care, and education.
4. Macrosystem
The macrosystem involves the broader society and cultural forces that contribute to individual development. Essential components of this level of Bronfenbrenner’s theory include:
- Values
- Social norms
- Customs
- Traditions
- Ideology
- Cultural beliefs
Groups of people often share these cultural beliefs with a similar history or identity. They can also shift over time and vary based on geographic location and socioeconomic status.
5. The Chronosystem
The chronosystem is the outermost level of the model, accounting for the role that time plays in influencing individual development. This includes:
- Personal experiences throughout life
- Various life transitions
- Historical events
- Societal changes
Challenges and transitions that can affect development, including the birth of siblings, moving to a new place, parental divorce, and the death of family members, can affect the family’s dynamic or structure.
The model recognizes that environments are not static; they change over time, and these changes can have a significant effect on how people develop.
How the Bronfenbrenner Ecological Model Works
The theory suggests that a child’s development is affected by the different environments that they encounter during their life, including biological, interpersonal, societal, and cultural factors.
This model describes the interactions between individuals and their environments and how these complex relationships affect development over time. According to this model, many interconnected systems make up a person’s environment that all interact to influence and shape how people grow and respond.
The factors that influence development include a person’s immediate setting and the broader culture in which they live.
The theory stresses the interdependency and interaction between people and their environments. Bronfenbrenner suggested that more nurturing and encouraging environments led to better developmental outcomes.
How the Systems Work Together
The interactions between different systems in Bronfenbrenner’s theory interact in intricate, bidirectional ways. The changes in one level can have a resounding impact on the other levels.
Examples of Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model
You can better understand the different levels of Bronfenbrenner’s model by looking at examples of the influences that exist at each level:
Microsystem
Home life
Parents
School
Friends
Siblings
Neighborhood
Childcare
Religion
Mesosystem
Interaction between kids, teachers, and parents
Interaction between friends and siblings
Interaction between neighborhood and family
Interaction between daycare and family
Exosystem
Extended family members
Mass media
Social services
Local government
Parents’ workplace
Family friends
Macrosystem
Values
Attitudes
Laws and legal systems
Customs
Ideologies
Political systems and policies
Nationality
Chronosystem
Historical events
Environmental changes
Parents employment status
Societal economic changes
Changes in family structure
Each system within the model interacts with other systems in complex ways. A child’s family (microsystem), for example, can impact how they interact with others at school (microsystem). The relationship between these microsystems (the mesosystem) can then impact a child’s behavior and academic success.
These systems don’t just interact with the levels that precede or follow them. And interactions that occur at one level can have cascading effects on other levels of influence
For example, workplace stress can impact how parents interact with their children at home. And economic changes that occur in a society (chronosystem) can influence the type of resources that are available in communities (exosystem), which can then play a role in the dynamics within individual families (microsystem).
By examining these influences more closely, we can gain a better appreciation of the dynamic interactions and interdependencies between the different levels of Bronfenbrenner’s theory.
Origins and Impact of the Ecological Model
This model, also known as the ecological systems theory, was introduced by Russian-American psychologist Urie Bronfenbrenner. Bronfenbrenner was born in Russia and immigrated to the United States when he was six. His early experiences shaped his ideas about how children adjust to new environments and how factors such as environment, language, and culture can play a part in how children learn and grow.
Bronfenbrenner earned his PhD in developmental psychology from the University of Michigan in 1942. He began developing his influential theory during the 1970s and presented his ideas in his 1979 book “The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design.” The book elaborated the key aspects of his theory.
Over time, Bronfenbrenner continued refining his ideas. In addition to emphasizing the importance of understanding how humans develop within their environmental contexts, he also stressed that this influence is bidirectional; humans also actively shape their surroundings.
Ecological systems theory has gained widespread acceptance, significantly influencing developmental psychology and related disciplines. The theory has also been applied in many different contexts, including:
Bronfenbrenner died in 2005, but his theory continues to profoundly influence our understanding of the dynamic interactions that affect how humans develop and change during childhood and throughout their lives.
Why Bronfenbrenner’s Model Still Matters Today
Bronfenbrenner’s theory significantly impacted how researchers, psychologists, and educators view human development. The ecological model continues to inform our understanding of how children develop and how different aspects of their environment may positively or negatively impact their growth.
The framework’s holistic approach emphasizes the need to understand all aspects of a person’s environment to appreciate the complex, interrelated factors that influence their development.
Some of the ways in which Bronfenbrenner’s model has influenced our understanding of human development include:
Education
The theory has been applied extensively within the field of education to help design effective learning environments that emphasize the classroom experience and focus on the influence of families, communities, societies, and the broader culture.
The early childhood education program, Head Start, first introduced in 1965, is an example of an intervention informed by Bronfenbrenner’s model. Urie Bronfenbrenner served as a government advisor for the development of the program. The program takes a holistic approach and supports infants, toddlers, and preschoolers to promote school readiness.
Research suggests the program has numerous benefits, including the long-term effects of increased high school completion, college enrollment, and college completion.
Mental Health Care
The ecological model also plays a role in informing mental health care. Mental health treatments that take a holistic approach often lead to better outcomes. And looking at the community, societal, and cultural influences that affect a person’s development and well-being can help mental health professionals understand the issues people face.
The framework has also affected approaches to mental health, both in terms of treatment and public policy. For example, it has contributed to the development of the ecological approach to counseling, which focuses on understanding personal and environmental factors when treating mental health issues.
Cultural Sensitivity
Because the model stresses how cultural factors can influence development, it can support greater cultural sensitivity among therapists, educators, and others.
Understanding ecological factors, for example, can produce greater cultural competency among therapists who work with diverse populations.
Limitations and Future Applications
While Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model is a helpful way to think about development, it does have limitations.
- Because it is so broad, it can be challenging to test different aspects of it empirically.
- It also doesn’t account for things like genetics and individual differences.
- Its emphasis on environmental influences may also lead to negative assumptions without recognizing that some individuals can thrive despite hardships.
Future applications for the Bronfenbrenner ecological model may focus on how digital environments may impact development. Social media, online learning, virtual communities, and artificial intelligence may all function as new layers within the ecological model.
Verywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
Tudge J, Maria Rosa E. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory. In: Hupp S, Jewell J, eds. The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development. 1st ed. Wiley; 2020. doi:10.1002/9781119171492.wecad251
Navarro JL, Tudge JRH. Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory [published online ahead of print, 2022 Jan 21]. Curr Psychol. 2022;1-17. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02738-3
Sarvan S, Muslu L. In the eyes of adolescents, is the pandemic an obstacle or a gain? A qualitative study based on the ecological theory. J Pediatr Nurs. 2022;66:15-22. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2022.05.012
Zwemer E, Chen F, Beck Dallaghan GL, et al. Reinvigorating an academy of medical educators using ecological systems theory. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e21640. doi:10.7759/cureus.21640
Haleemunnissa S, Didel S, Swami MK, Singh K, Vyas V. Children and COVID19: Understanding impact on the growth trajectory of an evolving generation. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021;120:105754. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105754
Tong P, An IS. Review of studies applying Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory in international and intercultural education research. Front Psychol. 2024;14:1233925. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233925
Hyde LW, Gard AM, Tomlinson RC, Burt SA, Mitchell C, Monk CS. An ecological approach to understanding the developing brain: Examples linking poverty, parenting, neighborhoods, and the brain. Am Psychol. 2020;75(9):1245-1259. doi:10.1037/amp0000741
Bailey MJ, Sun S, Timpe B. Prep school for poor kids: The long-run impacts of Head Start on human capital and economic self-sufficiency. Am Econ Rev. 2021;111(12):3963-4001. doi:10.1257/aer.20181801
Shafran R, Bennett SD, McKenzie Smith M. Interventions to support integrated psychological care and holistic health outcomes in paediatrics. Healthcare (Basel). 2017;5(3):44. doi:10.3390/healthcare5030044
Eriksson M, Ghazinour M, Hammarström A. Different uses of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory in public mental health research: what is their value for guiding public mental health policy and practice? Soc Theory Health. 2018;16(4):414-433. doi:10.1057/s41285-018-0065-6
Counseling Today. Using an ecological perspective.
Thanks for your feedback!
What is your feedback?
Helpful
Report an Error
Other
